The Return of 412 / Maximize Corporate Tax Deductions

A very hot business-planning topic today is the 412(i) qualified retirement plan. The reason is, these plans are providing exceptionally large tax deductions for contributions to a qualified plan.
What’s behind the buzz is the subject of my article today. Before exploring this plan, let’s review what 412(i) plans are and are not.

A 412(i) plan is a defined benefit qualified retirement plan. It is based on section 412(i) of the Internal Revenue Code. The IRC mandates that these plans must be funded with insurance contracts, either life or fixed annuity, guaranteed by an insurance company.

While such plans are subject to the normal rules that govern other defined benefit plans, the contributions for older employees can be considerably higher than allowed for in traditional defined benefit and/or defined contribution (401k profit sharing) plans. This is because the benefits can be funded using the minimum guaranteed interest rates of life and annuity contracts. This lower minimum guaranteed rate generates significantly higher tax deductions

Now, for what 412(i) plans are not: They are not 419 plans or VEBA (Voluntary Employment Beneficiary Associations) plans, both of which have come under a great deal of IRS scrutiny.

Who will most benefit from a 412(i) plan? In general, small businesses with twenty (20) or fewer employees are best suited for these plans, with one or two person businesses being ideal. Excellent prospects are high earning small business owners, doctors and real estate agents who have relatively stable and predictable earnings.

Note: Larger firms can benefit from 412(i) plans as well, but the plans are not as attractive for them because contributions to such plans must be made for all employees.

412(i) plans have been around for over 40 years, but they fell out of favor when the 1990’s bull stock market made defined contribution plans look more attractive, due to the high investment returns they were generating in the market at that time.

Today’s uncertain economy and stock market, has brought 412(i) plans back into favor; and they are now more popular than ever. The benefits they offer – dramatically increased tax deductions and secure guaranteed investment results – are exactly what business owners are looking for right now.

What’s more, the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 has created the potential for even higher contributions and deductions in all defined benefit plans, including the 412(i) plans. This, too, has helped to make these plans more attractive than ever.

How so? EGTRRA introduced several changes that have combined to boost tax deductions for business owners sponsoring 412(i) plans. The EGTRRA changes include: an increase in the maximum compensation used to determine benefits from $170,000 to $200,000; an increase in the maximum dollar limit for pensions from $140,000 to $160,000; and removal of any reduction on the dollar limit on benefits for participants retiring between age 62 and 65.

Today 412(i) plans provide clients, especially older clients, the largest contribution to a qualified plan, bar none!

For example, a 55-year-old consultant, using a retirement age of 62, could make a maximum contribution of $42,000 into a traditional profit sharing plan; or a $188,209 maximum contribution into a traditional defined benefit plan. But this consultant’s maximum tax-deductible contribution into a 412(i) plan could be as much as $332,357. Thus, if the consultant is in a 40% tax bracket, his income tax bill is lower, by over $130,000, due to the 412(i) plan.

Also, in this example, the 412(i) plan provides a contribution that is substantially higher than a traditional 401(k) profit sharing plan. See the chart below for other examples.

Maximum Contributions – Plan Comparison (2002 Limits) Age Retirement Age Traditional 401(k) Profit Sharing Traditional Defined Benefit 412(i) Plan 45 62 $40,000 $75,000 $145,236 50 62 $42,000 $128,166 $236,305 55 62 $42,000 $188,209 $332,357 60 65 $42,000 $194,847 $338,216

The 412(i) plan is very conservative. All asset accumulation rates and retirement benefits are fully guaranteed. This means these plans are safe from stock market fluctuations and are not influenced by economic down turns. They provide the added diversification that a traditional equity based portfolio needs to smooth out future investment performance.

The guaranteed rates in the insurance contracts that typically fund 412(i) plans are very competitive given today’s historically low interest rates. Current guaranteed rates will range from 4.5 to 5% and returns will average in the 6.25 to 7% range as interest rates begin to rise in the next few years.

The critical benefit in a 412(i) plan is how much income an individual can shelter from taxes. It’s the tax leverage that makes these plans superior to other types of plans. Another added benefit is that the life insurance policies than can be purchased in the plan are paid for with pre-tax contributions free death benefits to the beneficiaries on the pure death benefit above cash value. Still another advantage: A waiver of premium disability rider can be incorporated into the life policy, purchased with the plan to make this a self-completing plan if a disability occurs. How many qualified plans have that option?

Venture Capital – Indicators Point to Another Record Year

Area venture capital firms look forward to another record year
Established technology funds continue to thrive as new funds emerge to seed promising start-ups

Venture capitalists are working up an encore for their phenomenal 1999 performance. And so far, prospects for another blockbuster year look pretty good for Greater Philadelphia’s leading venture funds.

Certainly, nationally, venture investing continues to increase. Venture-backed investments hit a record $17.22 billion in a first quarter 2000, according to PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Money Tree Survey. That’s about 18 percent higher than the previous quarterly record of $14.68 billion, set in the fourth quarter 1999. And it’s more than four times higher than the $4.31 billion invested in first quarter 1999. The bulk of investments are in technology, with technology investments accounting for $34.3 billion in venture capital, more than the total amount invested in the preceding 11 years.

Wayne-based TL Ventures has played a leading role in this investing. Indeed, New York-based Technologic Partners included TL Ventures in its widely watched list of Top 10 Venture Capital Firms. With now-famous cofounders Pete Musser and Bob Keith, TL Ventures is something of a “granddaddy” of venture investing. Many new venture capital firms in the region are trying to imitate TL’s success.

Among the latest is the Eastern Technology Fund, headed by local investors Ian Berg, Wayne Kimmel and Rob McCord. It provides capital for seed-stage Internet and technology companies, and serves as a feeder for Safeguard Scientifics and PA Early Stage funds.

Predictably, plenty of start-ups are hungry for VC cash. The National Federation of Independent Businesses says its small- business optimism index, a measure of perceived growth prospects, keeps surging. And anecdotal evidence suggests a record number of entrepreneurs seeking venture investments. But the small business explosion also is being tempered by venture capitalists’ increasingly strong focus on profitability. Companies that bring goods and services to market quickly, then generate profits, will attract the greatest attention from VCs.

According to TL Ventures Managing Director Mark DeNino, “The market is a lot more selective today and that’s not likely to change anytime soon.”

History begins with Pete
Once upon a time, those who profited by aggregating money from a variety of investors — and creating a pool of capital to help promising businesses grow — had no clearly identified “profession” as “venture capitalists.” What is now called venture capital was then known simply as “table stakes.” Today, it is a well-accepted tenet of business that venture capitalism drives much of the New Economy. And one of the early leaders who helped make venture capital an economic force is Warren V. ‘Pete’ Musser, chairman of Safeguard Scientifics Inc. of Wayne.

“Anyone who reviews the history of the modern venture capital industry should make note of Pete as one true inventor of the field,” says Rob McCord, a venture capitalist and President of the Eastern Technology Council.

McCord says Musser “used incredible instincts, charisma, and a willingness to deviate from what were then standard practices.” Musser created a new type of publicly traded company — Safeguard — that allows investors of all sizes and types to benefit from venture investing. “Pete made many of the nation’s earliest and most profitable venture investments, and he helped popularize the concepts of venture investing and of developing publicly traded companies — like Wayne’s famously successful Internet Capital Group — that provide venture capital.

Now venture capitalism is one of the nation’s leading asset categories. Last year, according to one study, the U.S. capital pool represented 1.49 percent of the country’s gross domestic product. Moreover, industry research group Venture Economics reports that the average VC-backed company received a staggering $15 million in capital during first-quarter financing rounds, almost twice that of the same period in the previous year.

Lots of local buzz
No wonder, then, that start-ups and investors alike are excited about the emergence of new vehicles like the Eastern Technology Fund (ETF). Headed by managing directors Kimmel and Berg, it opened in February and expects to invest up to $20 million in more than 10 companies during the next few months.

In addition to strong alliances with Safeguard and PA Early Stage Partners, the fund has ties to the Technology Council, Ben Franklin Technology Partners of Southeastern Pennsylvania, and Omicron, a premier IT consulting firm.

Initial recipients of ETF investments are EZ Prints, the leading photofinisher for digital imaging; MarketMembers, which enables payroll deduction for common purchases; Ajunto, specializing in automation of e-commerce bidding for technology projects; and EnsuredMail, a secured electronic communications business.

The new fund has generated a lot of local buzz, with complimentary articles in Philadelphia and Philly Tech magazines, the Philadelphia Business Journal, and the Philadelphia Daily News.

Dozens of other venture capitalists also garner plenty of positive ink from the regional press. McCord points to John Martinson at New Jersey’s Edison Venture Fund, Frederick Beste III at Mid-Atlantic Venture Funds, and Mike Bolton, CEO of Pennsylvania Early Stage Partners, as well as Musser, Keith, DeNino, and the other founders and directors of TL Ventures as the heads of “large pools of venture capital that are attracting the best and the brightest in the American business world.”

Proximity counts
TL Ventures certainly ranks among the biggest, with about $750 million under management in five different funds. Like the high- profile technology companies it supports financially, TL Ventures is a bell-weather of sustained success in venture capital investing. All five TL funds rank in the top industry performance quartile, according to Venture Economics.

In addition to its headquarters on the Safeguard campus in Wayne, the firm also has offices in Austin, Tex., Los Angeles and Phoenix, and in May opened a fifth office in Dallas.

“The best way to do early stage investing is to be in close proximity to the companies you fund, so you can assist them as they grow,” explains TL Ventures’ DeNino. As an increasing number of investment opportunities open in various cities, TL maintains a presence there as well.

In addition, TL has taken what DeNino considers an industry- leading step by hosting a national series of interactive workshops for entrepreneurs, called Start Here. The hands-on sessions help promising Internet business candidates with business plan development, legal structure, financial management and fund-raising. The first workshop, held last October, won such rave reviews that three others were scheduled this year. Additionally, last year, TL hired Dr. Andrew Morozov to provide research and assistance to its portfolio companies.

Industry analysts say the highly personal, one-to-one relationship between the venture capitalist and the people running companies in which they invest has always been a VC’s key to survival in a turbulent business world. Many fund directors believe daily conversations with company principals are a must.

Unbridled enthusiasm
Observers agree the recent volatility of the stock market, and a relative dearth of initial public offerings, has cooled public interest in venture capital. But as the PricewaterhouseCoopers statistics show, there’s still tremendous enthusiasm and investment flowing from regional venture funds.

There is also, however, the recognition that investors are interested primarily in results; that is, businesses which have a sustainable ability to earn profits (not just “gain mindshare”). Savvy VCs search for companies that have the potential to outlast — not merely outspend — their competitors. Reuters News Service recently reported that winners of VC backing in this spring’s crop of business plan competitions were companies that demonstrated they could turn a profit no matter what happened on Wall Street.

Sound investments, sound performance. Sounds like the venture capitalists’ strategy to make 2000 another phenomenal year.

Power Line Communications

Power line communications stands for the use of power supply grid for communication purpose. Power line network has very extensive infrastructure in nearly each building. Because of that fact the use of this network for transmission of data in addition to power supply has gained a lot of attention. Since power line was devised for transmission of power at 50-60 Hz and at most 400 Hz, the use this medium for data transmission, at high frequencies, presents some technically challenging problems. Besides large attenuation, power line is one of the most electrically contaminated environments, which makes communication extremely difficult. Further more the restrictions imposed on the use of various frequency bands in the power line spectrum limit the achievable data rates.

Power lines connect the power generation station to a variety of customers dispersed over a wide region. Power transmission is done using varying voltage levels and power line cables. Power line cable characteristics and the number of crossovers play an important role in determining the kind of communication technology that needs to be used. Based on the voltage levels at which they transfer power lines can be categorized as follows

1. High-tension lines: These connect electricity generation stations to distribution stations. The voltage levels on these lines is typically in the order of hundreds of kilovolts and they run over distances of the order of tens of kilometers.

2. Medium-tension lines: These connect the distribution stations to pole mounted transformers. The voltage levels are of the order of a few kilo volts and they run over distances of the order of a few kilometers.

3. Low-tension lines: These connect pole-mounted transformers to individual households. The voltage levels on these lines are of the order of a few hundred volts and these run over distances of the order of a few hundred meters.

High-tension lines represent excellent carriers for RF energy as we only find open wire equipment with very few crossovers. A transmission power of about 10 watts is often sufficient to overcome distances of more than 500 kilometers. Around the year 1922 the first carrier frequency system (CFS) began to operate on high-tension lines in the frequency range of 15-1500 KHz. During the past and even nowadays the main purpose of CFS was to maintain the operability of the power supply. While in former times speech transmission was dominated, today we have more and more digital data communications due to the rapid progress of overall automation. Through the application of modern digital modulation and coding schemes, a significant enhancement of bandwidth efficiency could be achieved for CFS.

Medium- and low-tension lines are characterized by large number of cross connections and different conductor types (e.g. open wire and cable). Long distance RF signal propagation is extremely bad in this environment because of high attenuation and impedance matching problems. Around the year 1930 ripple carrier signaling (RCS) began to operate on these lines. These used frequency range below 3 KHz down to 125 Hz with amplitude shift keying (ASK) modulation technique. The data rates achieved by RCS was of the order of a few bits per second. Load management and automatic reconfiguration of power distribution networks were among the most important tasks performed by RCS.

We see that the use of power line communications in the past was mainly for use by the Utility Corporations (UCs) in maintaining the seamless power supply [Juj 98]. The UCs generally regarded the power distribution wiring as a “natural” medium for their communication needs, as all-important stations are connected. Recently, data communications over low-tension lines has gained a lot of attention [Bro99, Kai98]. This is fuel by the explosive growth of Internet along with advances in digital signal processing, error correction coding and electronic hardware. These helped in achieving medium to high data rates over low-tension power lines. Digital devices using low-tension power lines can be categorized based on the bandwidth they use. They are

Low bandwidth digital devices
These devices use carrier frequencies in the range 0-500 KHz and are primarily used for building automation. Different kinds of buildings may be upgraded into “smart homes” by using their power wires for communications. It should be noted that additional wiring for communication purposes is cost effective only in buildings under construction, whereas retrofitting is normally ruled out. A “smart house” can be defined as a building equipped with numerous sensors and actuators, where e.g. heating, air-conditioning, illumination can be automatically and remotely controlled and supervised. Furthermore safety systems such as burglar or fire alarms may be included [Dos97, Bra97].

Frequencies used by these devices is restricted by the limitations imposed by the regulatory agencies [Bro99]. These regulations are developed to ensure harmonious coexistence of various electromagnetic devices in the same environment. The frequency restrictions imposed in two of the main markets, North America and Europe, are shown in figure 1. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and European Committee for Electro technical Standardization (CENELEC) govern regulator rules in North America and Europe respectively.

In North America frequency band from 0 to 500 KHz can be used for power line communications. However the regulatory rules in Europe are more stringent. The spectrum is divided into five bands based on the regulations. They are

1. Frequency Band from 3 – 9 KHz: The use of this frequency band is limited to energy provides; however, with their approval it may also be used by other parties inside consumer’s premises.

2. Frequency Band from 9 – 95 KHz: The use of this frequency band is limited to the energy providers and their concession-holders. This frequency band is often referred as the “A-Band”

3. Frequency Band from 95 – 125 KHz: The use of this frequency band is limited to the energy provider’s costumers; no access protocol is defined for this frequency band. This frequency band is often referred as the “B-Band”

4. Frequency Band from 125 – 140 KHz: The use of this frequency band is limited to the energy providers customers; in order to make simultaneous operation of several systems within this frequency band possible, a carrier sense multiple access protocol using center frequency of 132.5 KHz was defined. This frequency band is often referred to as the “C-Band”

5. Frequency Band from 140 – 148.5 KHz: The use of this frequency band is limited to the energy provider’s customers; no access-protocol is defined for this frequency band. This frequency band is often referred to as the “D-Band”.

Thus in Europe power line communications is restricted to operate in the frequency range from 95 – 148.5 KHz. Apart from band allocation, regulatory bodies also impose limits on the radiations that are emitted by these devices. These reflect as restrictions on the transmitted power in each of these frequency bands.

Various protocols have been developed for use by low bandwidth digital devices for communication on power line. Each of these protocols different in the modulation technique, channel access mechanism and the frequency band they use. Various products based on these protocols are available in the market and are mainly used for home automation purposes. A brief overview of these protocols is presented here.

High bandwidth digital devices
High-speed data communication over low-tension power lines has recently gained lot of attention. This is fueled by the unparalleled growth of the Internet, which has created accelerating demand for digital telecommunications. High bandwidth digital devices are designed to exploit this market. More specifically, these devices use the existing power line infrastructure within the apartment, office or school building for providing a local area network (LAN) to interconnect various digital devices. It has to be noted that the existing infrastructure for communications like telephone line, Cable TV has very few outlets inside the buildings. By use of gateways between these and Power line LANs a variety of services can be offered to customers. Some of the applications include high-speed Internet access, multimedia, smart appliances/remote control, home automation and security; data back up, telecommunications, entertainment and IP-telephony.

High bandwidth digital devices for communication on power line use the frequency band between 1 MHz and 30 MHz. In contrast to low bandwidth digital devices, no regulatory standards have been developed for this region of the spectrum. Devices using this unlicensed band need to be compliant with the radiation emission limits imposed by the regulatory bodies. It should be noted that internationally agreed, distress, broadcast, citizen band and amateur radio frequencies also occupy this portion of the spectrum. Hence, the technologies being developed for high-speed digital communication over power line should have the ability to mask certain frequency bands for future compatibility. In the section that follows gives a brief overview of power line channel characteristics in the frequency band between 1 MHz and 30 MHz.

« Previous Page